Parody religion

A parody religion or mock religion is a parody of a religion, sect or cult. A parody religion can be a parody of several religions, sects, gurus and cults at the same time. Or, it can be a parody of no particular religion, instead parodying the concept of religious belief. In some parody religions the emphasis is on making fun and being a convenient excuse for pleasant social interaction among like-minded, e.g. the Church of the SubGenius. Other parody religions target a specific religion, sect, cult, or new religious movement.

One approach to parody religion aims to highlight deficiencies in particular pro-religious arguments — the thinking being that if a given argument can also be used to support a clear parody, then the original argument is clearly flawed. An example of this is the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which parodies the equal time argument employed by intelligent design Creationism.[1]

Several religions that are classified as parody religions have a number of relatively serious followers who embrace the perceived absurdity of these religions as spiritually significant, a decidedly post-modern approach to religion. For instance, in Discordianism, it may be hard to tell if even these "serious" followers are not just taking part in an even bigger joke. This joke, in turn, may be part of a greater path to enlightenment, and so on ad infinitum.

Contents

List of notable parody religions

Parodies of particular beliefs

The following were created as parodies of particular religious beliefs:

Post-modern religions

The following are post-modern religions that may be seen as elaborate parodies of 'real' religions:

Usage by atheist commentators

I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
 
— Stephen F. Roberts[5]

Many atheists, including Richard Dawkins, use parody religions such as those of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and the Invisible Pink Unicorn — as well as ancient gods like Zeus and Thor — as modern versions of Russell's teapot to argue that the burden of proof is on the believer, not the atheist.[6]

Dawkins also created a parody of the criticism of atheism, coining the term athorism, or the firm belief that the Norse deity Thor does not exist. The intention is to emphasize the claim that atheism is not a form of religious creed, but instead merely denial of beliefs.[7] A common challenge against atheism is the idea that atheism is itself a form of "faith", a belief without proof. The theist might say "No one can prove that God does not exist, therefore an atheist is exercising faith by asserting that there is no God." Dawkins argues that by replacing the word "God" with "Thor" one should see that the assertion is fallacious. The burden of proof, he claims, rests upon the believer in the supernatural, not upon the non-believer who considers such things unlikely. Athorism is an attempt to illustrate through absurdity that there is no logical difference between disbelieving any particular religion.

See also

References

  1. ^ USA Today - Spaghetti Monster is noodling around with faith
  2. ^ "Say 'Hebbo' to Tarvuism!". Chortle.co.uk. http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2008/10/14/7588/say_hebbo_to_tarvuism!. Retrieved 2010-10-30. 
  3. ^ Leander Kahney (December 5, 2002). "Worshipping at the Altar of Mac". Wired. http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/commentary/cultofmac/2002/12/56674?currentPage=all. Retrieved October 28, 2011. 
  4. ^ UK govt statistics on Jedi
  5. ^ Dianna Narciso. Like Rolling Uphill: Realizing the Honesty of Atheism. pp. 6. ISBN 1932560742. 
  6. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). "Chapter 2: The God Hypothesis". The God Delusion. London: Bantam. ISBN 9780593055489. 
  7. ^ Richard, Dawkins. "Let's Hope It's A Lasting Vogue". On Faith (Newsweek). http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/richard_dawkins/2007/01/athorism_is_enjoying_a_certain.html. Retrieved 2007-04-12. 

External links